The discussion about PEP 343 reminds me of the following. Bram Cohen
pointed out in private email that, before PEP 342, there wasn't a big
need for a shortcut to pass control to a "sub-generator" because the
following for-loop works well enough:
def main_generator():
...
for value in sub_generator():
yield value
but now that yield can return a value, that value might have to be
passed into sub_generator(), not to mention of exceptions. I'm sure
there's a way to write that (although I haven't found the time to
figure it out) but I expect it to be cumbersome and subtle. I don't
think a helper function can be created to solve this problem, because
the yield syntax is essential.
Bram suggested the following syntax:
def main_generator():
...
yieldthrough sub_generator()
I'm not keen on that particular keyword, but I do believe a syntactic
solution is needed, if the problem is important enough to be solved.
Thoughts?
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
