On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 16:17 +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
>
> > > If a URI class implemented the same methods, it would be something of a
> > > question whether uri.joinpath('/foo/bar', 'baz') would return '/foo/baz'
> > > (and urlparse.urljoin would) or '/foo/bar/baz' (as os.path.join does).
> > > I assume it would be be the latter, and urljoin would be a different
> > > method, maybe something novel like "urljoin".
> >
> > I honestly don't understand the usefulness of join('/foo/bar', 'baz')
> > ever returning '/foo/baz' instead of '/foo/bar/baz'. How would the
> > former be of any use?
>
> it's how URL:s are joined, as noted in the paragraph you replied to
>
> (a "baz" link on the page "/foo/bar" refers to "/foo/baz", not "/foo/bar/baz")
That's not how I see it. A web browser, in order to resolve the link
'baz' in the page '/foo/bar', should do:
join(basename('/foo/bar'), 'baz')
== join('/foo', 'baz')
== '/foo/baz'.
Regards.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
