> On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> 
> So let's make as_integer_ratio() the standard protocol for "how to make a 
> Fraction out of a number that doesn't implement numbers.Rational". We already 
> have two examples of this (float and Decimal) and perhaps numpy or the 
> sometimes proposed fixed-width decimal type can benefit from it too. If this 
> means we should add it to int, that's fine with me.

I would like that outcome.  

The signature x.as_integer_ratio() -> (int, int) is pleasant to work with.  The 
output is easy to explain, and the denominator isn't tied to powers of two or 
ten. Since Python ints are exact and unbounded, there isn't worry about range 
or rounding issues.

In contrast, math.frexp(float) ->(float, int) is a bit of pain because it still 
leaves you in the domain of floats rather than letting you decompose to more 
more basic types.  It's nice to have a way to move down the chain from ℚ, ℝ, or 
ℂ to the more basic ℤ (of course, that only works because floats and complex 
are implemented in a way that precludes exact irrationals).


Raymond


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to