On 27 March 2018 at 01:17, Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com> wrote: > On 3/26/18 11:10 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote: >> >> On 3/26/18 11:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> >>> On 27 March 2018 at 00:40, Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com> wrote: > > >>> Would it be feasible to define `Field.__set_name__`, and have that >>> call `default.__set_name__` when the latter exists, and be a no-op >>> otherwise? >> >> >> A clever idea! I'll look in to it. > > It looks like that does work. Thank, Nick!
Cool! Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
