Hi Julia, and welcome!
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:14:53PM -0700, Julia Kim wrote:
> My suggestion is to change the syntax for creating an empty set and an
> empty dictionary as following.
>
> an_empty_set = {}
> an_empty_dictionary = {:}
>
> It would seem to make more sense.
Indeed it would, and if sets had existed in Python since the beginning,
that's probably exactly what we would have done. But unfortunately they
didn't, and {} has meant an empty dict forever.
The requirement to keep backwards-compatibility is a very, very hard
barrier to cross. I think we all acknowledge that it is sad and a little
bit confusing that {} means a dict not a set, but it isn't sad or
confusing enough to justify breaking millions of existing scripts and
applications.
Not to mention the confusing transition period when the community would
be using *both* standards at the same time, which could easily last ten
years.
Given that, I think we just have to accept that having to use set() for
the empty set instead of {} is a minor wart on the language that we're
stuck with.
If you disagree, and think that you have a concrete plan that can make
this transition work, we'll be happy to hear it, but you'll almost
certainly need to write a PEP before it could be accepted.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/
Thanks,
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
