On 04/17/2018 07:01 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:17 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
That ambiguity generally doesn't exist with simple name bindings (I'm
excluding execution namespaces with exotic binding behaviour from
consideration here, as the consequences of trying to work with those
are clearly on the folks defining and using them).
The cool thing about the simple and naive code is that even those
should work. I don't have an example ready for demo, but I fully
expect that it would 'just work' the exact same way; the namespace
would never be retrieved from, only set to.
Hmm. I don't know what the consequences would be on class namespace
with a non-vanilla dict. Probably functionally identical. But there
might be some extremely weird cases if the namespace dict accepts
setitem and then raises KeyError for that key.
If you want to play with a non-standard (okay, wierd) class namespaces, you can try using the assignment expression in
an Enum class.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
