On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> wrote: > := also goes against having one obvious way to do it. Since it's an > expression, > it can also be placed on its own line or in otherwise weird places like > function call arguments. I anticipate PEP 8 would have to be extended to > explicitly discourage such abuse. Linters would grow rules against it. This is > noise.
Does this argument also apply to the if/else expression? Do linters need rules to advise against people writing code like: print(x) if x is None else print(y) ? It's perfectly legal to write code like this. But I don't see people abusing this sort of thing. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
