Just as I feared. While currently fixing this is just fixing a bug
(nobody's code is going to break except perhaps some tests), with PEP 572
fixing this would be mandatory.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 April 2018 at 18:23, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> x={print(2): print(1) for _ in [1]}
> > 1
> > 2
> >
> > Hmmmmmmmmm. One of these is not like the others...
>
> Huh, it looks like we missed checking dict comprehensions when we
> fixed dict displays to evaluate keys before the corresponding values.
> That would qualify as a reasonable request for improvement in Python
> 3.8 :)
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
> --
> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> guido%40python.org
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
