Just as I feared. While currently fixing this is just fixing a bug (nobody's code is going to break except perhaps some tests), with PEP 572 fixing this would be mandatory.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 April 2018 at 18:23, Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> x={print(2): print(1) for _ in [1]} > > 1 > > 2 > > > > Hmmmmmmmmm. One of these is not like the others... > > Huh, it looks like we missed checking dict comprehensions when we > fixed dict displays to evaluate keys before the corresponding values. > That would qualify as a reasonable request for improvement in Python > 3.8 :) > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
