Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You seem to be talking about an implementation which could change in the future. I'm talking semantics of the proposed language feature.
The way I see it, it's not about implementation details, it's about having a mental model that's easy to reason about. "Comprehensions run in their own scope, like a def or lambda" is a clear and simple mental model. It's easy to explain and keep in your head. The proposed semantics are much more complicated, and as far as I can see, are only motivated by use cases that you shouldn't really be doing in the first place. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
