On 25 June 2018 at 22:17, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, the most cryptic parent local scoping related exception I've > been able to devise so far still exhibits PEP 572's desired "Omitting > the comprehension scope entirely would give you the same name lookup > behaviour" semantics: > > >>> def outer(x=1): > ... def middle(): > ... return [x := x + i for i in range(10)] > ... return middle() > ... > >>> outer() > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > NameError: free variable 'x' referenced before assignment in enclosing > scope > > It isn't the parent local scoping, or even the assignment expression, > that's at fault there, since you'd get exactly the same exception for: > > def outer(x=1): > def middle(): > x = x +1 > return x > return middle()
Oops, I didn't mean to say "exactly the same exception" here, as the whole reason I'd settled on this example as the most cryptic one I'd found so far was the fact that the doubly nested version *doesn't* give you the same exception as the singly nested version: the version without the comprehension throws UnboundLocalError instead. However, the resolution is the same either way: either 'x' has to be declared as 'nonlocal x' in 'middle', or else it has to be passed in to 'middle' as a parameter. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
