Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was recently reviewing a lot of the Python 2.4 code I have written,
> and I've noticed one thing: thanks to the attrgetter and itemgetter
> functions in module operator, I've been using (or been tempted to use)
> far fewer lambdas, particularly but not exclusively in key= arguments
> to sort and sorted.
Interesting. Something I'd noticed was that *until* the key= argument
to sort appeared, I was hardly using any lambdas at all (most of the
places I had used them were rendered obsolete by list comprehensions).
> Most of those "lambda temptations" will be
> removed by PEP 309 (functional.partial), and most remaining ones are
> of the form:
> lambda x: x.amethod(zip, zop)
>
> So I was thinking -- wouldn't it be nice to have (possibly in module
> functional, like partial; possibly in module operator, like itemgetter
> and attrgetter -- I'm partial to functional;-) a methodcaller entry
> akin to (...possibly with a better name...):
>
> def methodcaller(methodname, *a, **k):
> def caller(self):
> getattr(self, methodname)(*a, **k)
> caller.__name__ = methodname
> return caller
>
> ...? This would allow removal of even more lambdas.
>
> I'll be glad to write a PEP, but I first want to check whether the
> Python-Dev crowd would just blast it out of the waters, in which case
> I may save writing it...
Hmm.
>>> funcTakingCallback(lamda x:x.method(zip, zop))
>>> funcTakingCallback(methodcaller("method", zip, zop))
I'm not sure which of these is clearer really. Are lambdas so bad?
(FWIW, I haven't internalized itemgetter/attrgetter yet and still tend
to use lambdas instead those too).
A class I wrote (and lost) ages ago was a "placeholder" class, so if
'X' was an instance of this class, "X + 1" was roughly equivalent to
"lambda x:x+1" and "X.method(zip, zop)" was roughly equivalent to your
"methodcaller("method", zip, zop)". I threw it away when listcomps
got implemented. Not sure why I mention it now, something about your
post made me think of it...
Cheers,
mwh
--
If you give someone Fortran, he has Fortran.
If you give someone Lisp, he has any language he pleases.
-- Guy L. Steele Jr, quoted by David Rush in comp.lang.scheme.scsh
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
