I think I tried a variation of your proposal here
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-April/152939.html
and nobody really liked it.

Yury
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:44 PM Alexander Belopolsky
<alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wish I had more time to make my case, but with the PEP 572 pronouncement 
> imminent, let me make an attempt to save Python from having two assignment 
> operators.
>
> I've re-read the PEP, and honestly I am warming up to the idea of allowing a 
> limited form of assignment in expressions.  It looks like in the current 
> form, the PEP supports only well-motivated cases where the return value of 
> the assignment expression is non-controversial.  It also appears that there 
> are no cases where = can be substituted for := and not cause a syntax error.  
> This means that ":" in ":=" is strictly redundant.
>
> Interestingly, Python already has a precedent for using redundant ":" - the 
> line-ending ":" in various statements is redundant, but it is helpful both 
> when reading and writing the code.
>
> On the other hand, ':' in ':=' looks like an unnecessary embellishment.  When 
> we use ':=', we already know that we are inside an expression and being 
> inside an expression is an obvious context for the reader, the writer and the 
> interpreter.
>
> I also believe, allowing a limited form of assignment in expressions is a 
> simpler story to tell to the existing users than an introduction of a new 
> operator that is somewhat like '=', but cannot be used where you currently 
> use '=' and only in places where '=' is currently prohibited.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/yselivanov.ml%40gmail.com



-- 
         Yury
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to