Should we update some PEPs with the new status? E.g. PEP 484. On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks, > > After review from Barry & Guido, I've just merged an update to PEP 1 > and the PEP index generator that separates out provisionally accepted > PEPs to their own state in the PEP flow: > > https://github.com/python/peps/commit/307dda38d4e7a5760dd4979ae9978a4eb1e70589 > > To date, that status has been reported as "Accepted" both in the > original PEPs and in the main PEP index, now it gets reported as > Provisional in both places. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > P.S. As part of this, I switched the flow diagram in PEP 1 from a PNG > to an SVG, which seems to have confused python.org's image rendering: > https://github.com/python/peps/issues/701 > > I'm already looking into it, but am open to tips from folks more > familiar with the website's rendering machinery. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
