BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 2/4/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I won't even look at the PEP as long as it uses / or // (or any other >> operator) for concatenation. > > That's good, because it doesn't. :) > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0355.html > No, but it does say that / may be reintroduced 'if the BFDL so desires'. I hope that doesn't mean the BDFL may be overruled. :^) I'm not convinced by the rationale given why atime,ctime,mtime and size are methods rather than properties but I do find this PEP much more agreeable than the last time I looked at it. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
