> > I am comparing calls through tp_call (A) versus optimized call paths > (B). I only need to assume that the speed improvements to (A) between > 2.7 and 3.7 are not bigger than the speed improvements to (B). >
It's interesting... But I failed to build sage. It's build step is too different from normal Python package. It tooks very long time to build. And "install from source" document only describe step to `./sage` command work. It doesn't describe step to `improt sage` works. I feel it's not suitable for target application for discussing future optimization. Target application should be easy to test, benchmark and profile for all of core-devs interesting in these PEPs. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
