On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:05:52 -0700 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 07:47 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > > On 8/1/2018 6:17 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > On 2018-07-31 11:12, INADA Naoki wrote: > > >> Any PEP won't be accepted in few month, because we don't have flow to > > >> accept PEPs for now. > > > > > > Is that certain? I haven't been following the process discussions, so > > > I'm just asking the question. For example, given that you are already > > > looking at PEP 580, would it be possible for you to handle PEP 580 as > > > official BDFL-Delegate (even if there is no BDFL)? > > > > I think this would be a reasonable thing to discuss either here or on > > the committers list or both. > > > > If there was an absolute certainty of who the BDFL delegate would be then > we might be able to not wait, but without that I don't know if enough core > devs will feel comfortable choosing one right now.
We could proceed by consensus: the PEP author publicly proposes a PEP delegate, and if no core developer opposes, that person is officially accepted as delegate. Often PEP authors have a pretty good idea of who can be a delegate for a PEP. This is especially true on specialized topics which only a couple core devs are interested in discussing actively. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
