Hi, this is getting a bit out of scope for this list. I propose to move further questions about general Cython usage to he cython-users mailing list.
Matěj Cepl schrieb am 08.08.2018 um 12:44: > On 2018-08-06, 15:13 GMT, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Not sure I understand this correctly, but I think we're on the >> same page here: writing test code in C is cumbersome, writing >> test code in a mix of C and Python across different files is >> aweful. And making it difficult to write or even just review >> test code simply means that people will either waste their >> precious contribution time on it, or try to get around it. > > I was thinking about the same when porting M2Crypto to py3k > (M2Crypto is currently swig-based mix of C-code and Python). Is > it even possible to make a mix of Cython, swig-based C, and > Python? As long as you take the decision at a per-module basis, sure. If you want to mix them inside of a single module, then it's either Cython+C or Swig+C, not all three. But as Antoine suggested, unless you really want an identical mapper for whole range of different languages, Swig is likely not what you should use these days. > In the end I rather stayed with plain C, because the > combination seems unimaginably awful. Probably worth expanding your imagination. :) Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
