On 09/14/2018 02:54 PM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
On 2018-09-14, Larry Hastings wrote:
[...]
improvement 0.21242667903482038 %
I assume that should be 21.2 % othewise I recommend you abandon the
idea. ;-P
Yeah, that thing you said.
I wonder how much of the speedup relies on putting it in the data
segment (i.e. using linker/loader to essentially handle the
unmarshal). What if you had a new marshal format that only needed a
light 2nd pass in order to fix up the data loaded from disk?
Some experimentation would be in order. I can suggest that, based on
conversation from Carl, that adding the stat calls back in costs you
half the startup. So any mechanism where we're talking to the disk _at
all_ simply isn't going to be as fast.
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
