On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:05:01 +0100, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:33:57AM +0000, Bengt Richter wrote: > >> Perhaps I missed a py3k assumption in this thread (where I see in the PEP >> that "Remove distinction between int and long types" is core item number >> one)? > >http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0237.html -- an ungoing process, not a >Py3K-eventual one. > Thanks, I noticed. Hence my question following what you quote: """ Is PEP 237 phase C to be implemented sooner than py3k, making isinstance(<something>, int) a transparently distinction-hiding alias for isinstance(<something>, integer), or outright illegal? IOW, will isinstance(<something>, int) be _guaranteed_ to be a bug, thus requiring code change? If so, when? """ Sorry that my paragraph-packing habit tends to bury things. I'll have to work on that ;-/ Regards, Bengt Richter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
