On 2/6/06, Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah... the problem is differentiating the empty set from an empty dict. > The only alternative that occured to me was the not-so-nice and > not-backwards-compatible "{:}" for an empty dict and "{}" for an empty > set.
How about spelling the empty set as ``set()''? Wouldn't that solve the ambiguity and the backwards compatibility nicely? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com