On Wednesday, October 3, 2018, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2018年10月3日(水) 21:24 Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be>: > >> Hello, >> >> >> I am well aware of the current governance issues, but several people >> have mentioned that the BDFL-Delegate process can still continue for >> now. > > > Really? > I don't know process to assign BDFL-delegate without BDFL. > AFAIU, there is not yet a documented process for BDFL-delegate assignment. There's this in the devguide; which links to PEP1: "20.2. PEP Process¶" https://devguide.python.org/langchanges/#pep-process https://github.com/python/devguide/blob/master/langchanges.rst And PEP 1: "PEP 1 -- PEP Purpose and Guidelines" "PEP Workflow" https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/#pep-workflow "PEP Editors" https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/#pep-editors "PEP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow" https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/#pep-editor-responsibilities-workflow https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0001.txt And the devguide has a list of experts: https://devguide.python.org/experts/ Maybe PEP1 is the place to list current BDFL-Delegates (in addition to in the PEP metadata as in the OT PR: python/peps#797 "PEP 580: Petr Viktorin as BDFL-Delegate" )? Not to bikeshed, but is BDFL-Delegate still the current term because that's what's in all the other PEPs' metadata? > > This PEP is mainly for third party tools. > I want to get much feedback from them before new APIs become stable (e.g. > 3.8b1) > > So I want this PEP is approved (or > Provisionally Accepted) and reference implementation is merged as fast as > possible. > > Regards, > >> >>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
