I'm also fine with saying that keys in **kwargs that are not proper
identifiers is an implementation detail.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 02:20, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 04.10.18 11:56, Steven D'Aprano пише:
> > While keyword arguments have to be identifiers, using **kwargs allows
> > arbitrary strings which aren't identifiers:
> >
> > py> def spam(**kwargs):
> > .... print(kwargs)
> > ....
> > py> spam(**{"something arbitrary": 1, '\n': 2})
> > {'something arbitrary': 1, '\n': 2}
> >
> >
> > There is some discussion on Python-Ideas on whether or not that
> > behaviour ought to be considered a language feature, an accident of
> > implementation, or a bug.
> >
> > Can we get some guidence on this please?
>
> This is an implementation detail. Currently CPython doesn't ensure that
> keyword argument names are identifiers for performance reasons. But this
> can be changed in future versions or in other implementations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
