As a piece of pure experiential data based on some years trying to herd the PSF cats, if python-dev can find a way of running its activities without votes needing to be taken I would really emphasise the benefits of the lack of such administration.
If voting is required, please consider using the PSF to manage such activity. Following the debate with interest, but mostly lurking due to my usual absence of skin in the game. Bonne chance! regards Steve Steve Holden On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 13:20, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > >> What is the timeframe for the installation of the new governance? In >> other words, when will it be possible to review PEPs? >> > > PEP 8001 outlines the voting for the governance models which includes a > planned schedule for that vote. After that it will vary depending on which > governance model is chosen as some of them require electing people to > positions while others don't. The overall goal is to have the whole ting > resolved no later than probably March (but probably sooner than that). > Basically this should not be a new thing come PyCon US in May. > > But since you're asking about wanting to "review PEPs", you can review > them now. There hasn't been much change to them lately so they are pretty > stable at this point. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > steve%40holdenweb.com > >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
