On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:26:06 +1100 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Disclaimer: I'm not a ctypes expert, so I might have this completely > wrong. If so, I apologise for the noise. > > The id() function is documented as returning an abstract ID number. In > CPython, that happens to have been implemented as the address of the > object. > > I understand that the only way to pass the address of an object to > ctypes is to use that id. Is that intentional?
Can you explain in detail what you're doing? If you're calling a C API taking a PyObject*, it seems like you should be using ctypes.py_object as argument type specifier. Various examples can be found with Google. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
