On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 10:39, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:25:37AM +0000, Paul Moore wrote: > > > PS I would also prefer not to have to re-sign, but just have my > > existing confirmation carried over. I don't *know* if there are any > > implications at my end around re-signing, and my preference is simply > > to not ask that question (on the basis of why make things harder for > > myself). But if it's needed, then fair enough. > > Because what you don't know can't hurt you? > > You're signing a legal document. Shouldn't you understand the > implications of signing it before you sign?
Sigh. Trust me that I know what I'm saying, please. I do understand the implications. And re-signing a CLA *will* involve different processes for me than a simple continuance of an existing CLA - even if that CLA is confirmed by the PSF as legally identical to the new one. I can, and will, negotiate that difficulty myself if necessary - but honestly, it's not really the place of anyone on this list to tell me what I need to do in order to ensure my compliance with the CLA and with my employer's policies. I offered the information for awareness, to ensure that the people proposing this change knew that it had the potential to incur extra work for people being asked to re-sign, beyond the mere mechanics of re-signing. I did not expect arguments over my understanding of what I needed to do (nor did I expect the Spanish Inquisition, but *nobody* expects that ;-)) Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
