Jiwon Seo wrote: > Then, is there any chance anonymous function - or closure - is > supported in python 3.0 ? Or at least have a discussion about it?
That discussion appears to be closed (or, not really: everybody can discuss, but it likely won't change anything). > (IMHO, closure is very handy for function like map, sort etc. And > having to write a function for multiple statement is kind of good in > that function name explains what it does. However, I sometimes feel > that having no name at all is clearer. Also, having to define a > function when it'll be used only once seemed inappropriate sometimes.) Hmm. Can you give real-world examples (of existing code) where you needed this? Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
