On 2019-03-24 16:22, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi Petr,
Regarding PEPs 576 and 580.
Over the new year, I did a thorough analysis of possible approaches to
possible calling conventions for use in the CPython ecosystems and came
up with a new PEP.
The draft can be found here:
https://github.com/markshannon/peps/blob/new-calling-convention/pep-9999.rst
Thanks for that. Is this new PEP meant to supersede PEP 576?
I'd like to have a testable branch, before formally submitting the PEP,
but I'd thought you should be aware of the PEP.
If you want to bring up this PEP now during the PEP 576/580 discussion,
maybe it's best to formally submit it now? Having an official PEP number
might simplify the discussion. If it turns out to be a bad idea after
all, you can still withdraw it.
In the mean time, I remind you that PEP 576 also doesn't have a complete
reference implementation (the PEP links to a "reference implementation"
but it doesn't correspond to the text of the PEP).
Jeroen.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
