On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:18 AM Chris Barker via Python-Dev <python-dev@python.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:20 AM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >>> >>> >> This doesn't strike me as needing an optimization through a dedicated method. > > maybe a new dict mapping type -- "shared_dict" -- it would be used in places > like the csv reader where it makes sense, but wouldn't impact the regular > dict at all. > > you could get really clever an have it auto-convert to a regular dict when > any changes were made that are incompatible with the shared keys...
My current idea is adding builder in somewhere in stdlib (maybe collections?): builder = DictBuilder(keys_tuple) value = builder(values) # repeatedly called. I don't want to add new mapping type because we already have shared key dict, and changing mapping type may cause backward compatibility problem. Regards, -- Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com