On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:18 AM Chris Barker via Python-Dev
<python-dev@python.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:20 AM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> This doesn't strike me as needing an optimization through a dedicated method.
>
> maybe a new dict mapping type -- "shared_dict" -- it would be used in places 
> like the csv reader where it makes sense, but wouldn't impact the regular 
> dict at all.
>
> you could get really clever an have it auto-convert to a regular dict when 
> any changes were made that are incompatible with the shared keys...


My current idea is adding builder in somewhere in stdlib (maybe collections?):

  builder = DictBuilder(keys_tuple)
  value = builder(values)  # repeatedly called.

I don't want to add new mapping type because we already have shared key dict,
and changing mapping type may cause backward compatibility problem.


Regards,
-- 
Inada Naoki  <songofaca...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to