PyType_FromSpec() looks like a better approach for ABI compatibility. My notes on types and ABI: https://pythoncapi.readthedocs.io/type_object.html
Victor Le lun. 6 mai 2019 à 09:57, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> a écrit : > > Hello, > > I have a simple question for which there doesn't seem to be a good > answer: is the layout of PyTypeObject considered to be part of the > stable ABI? > > Officially, the answer is certainly "no" (see PEP 384). > > However, unofficially the answer might be "yes". At least, the last time > that an incompatible change was made to PyTypeObject (adding tp_finalize > in Python 3.4, PEP 442), care was taken not to break the ABI by using > the Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_FINALIZE flag. > > There is some discussion about this on https://bugs.python.org/issue32388 > > The implementation of PEP 590 is going to make another ABI-breaking > change. So should we add a new Py_TFLAGS_HAVE_... flag for that or not? > > > Jeroen. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/vstinner%40redhat.com -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
