OMG. Are we now adding 'const' modifiers to random places? I thought
"const propagation hell" was a place we were happily avoiding by not
falling for that meme. What changed?
--Guido
On 2/10/06, Jack Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keep running into problems with the "const" modifications to
> PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords() (rev. 41638 by Jeremy).
>
> I have lots of code of the form
> char *kw[] = {"itself", 0};
>
> if (PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(_args, _kwds, "O&", kw,
> CFTypeRefObj_Convert, &itself)) ...
> which now no longer compiles, neither with C nor with C++ (gcc4, both
> MacOSX and Linux). Changing the kw declaration to "const char *kw[]"
> makes it compile again.
>
> I don't understand why it doesn't compile: even though the
> PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords signature promises that it won't change
> the "kw" argument I see no reason why I shouldn't be able to pass a
> non-const argument.
>
> And to make matters worse adding the "const" of course makes the code
> non-portable to previous versions of Python (where the C compiler
> rightly complains that I'm passing a const object through a non-const
> parameter).
>
> Can anyone enlighten me?
> --
> Jack Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma
> Goldman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
