[Tim\ > For the current obmalloc, I have in mind a different way ... > Not ideal, but ... captures the important part (more objects > in a pool -> more times obmalloc can remain in its > fastest "all within the pool" paths).
And now there's a PR that removes obmalloc's limit on pool sizes, and, for a start, quadruples pool (and arena!) sizes on 64-bit boxes: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13934 https://bugs.python.org/issue37211 As the PR says, """ It would be great to get feedback from 64-bit apps that do massive amounts of small-object allocations and deallocations. """ :-) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/Z4YIHDGNZLP4WX5HVEBXDSFIDIWPTTYK/
