On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:36:33 -0700
Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote:
> On 18Jun2019 1025, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Oleg Broytman writes:  
> >   > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:09:59AM -0000, smartmanoj42...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:  
> >   
> >   > > Why don't we check the architecture using js and provide the
> >   > > appropriate version?  
> >   >
> >   >    Because the downloading computer is not necessary the installation
> >   > target.  
> > 
> > Sure, but (a) it's a good bet, and (b) somebody downloading to install
> > on a different machine is more likely to know what they're doing and
> > be conscious of issues of platform.  
> 
> Equally, someone more conscious of the issues will know to go and get 
> the 64-bit version if they explicitly want it.

The main download button doesn't say anything about being 
32-bit. So unless you *know* that you're going to be given the 32-bit
version, you'll blindly download and install it.

When coming from a non-Windows OS it is weird and unexpected to be given
a 32-bit version by default.

(this just happened to me, incidentally)

Regards

Antoine.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UFZWIWAAHN4TPD56VWNHMWTMWXMGBOUQ/

Reply via email to