On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:41 PM Pablo Galindo Salgado <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > What do people feel about exposing Tools/parser/unparse.py in the standard > library? Here is my initial rationale: > > * The tool already needs to be maintained and updated as is tested as part of > the test suite. > * I have used the tool almost all the time I needed to deal with AST > transformations. > * The public interface will have a very low surface API, keeping maintaining > it (the public interface) a very small burden IMHO. > > We could add the public interface to the ast.py module or a new one if people > feel strongly about it.
How does it compare to Berker's popular and well-maintained PyPI package for this? https://github.com/berkerpeksag/astor -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EDOBFEJDKANKWCAYEVLWTTXSCM3OIMXE/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
