Hi everyone,
Thanks again for all your comments on PEP 611.
I would like to ask a favour; please be more specific in your comments.
Ideally state which part of the PEP you are disagreeing with and why you
disagree with the relevant part of the rationale/motivation.
Also, when asking for limits to be raised or removed entirely, could you
state what you perceive to be the costs and benefits of larger limits.
What do you believe is an acceptable cost in memory or runtime for
larger limits?
For example, you might say that the limit of one million lines of code
per module is too small, and that it is worth a small, say 1%, impact on
speed to allow a larger of limit of 100 million.
If you believe a limit would have no cost, then please give a
explanation of why that is so.
Merely saying that you would like a larger limit is pointless.
If there were no cost to arbitrarily large limits, then I wouldn't have
proposed the PEP in the first place.
Bear in mind that the costs of higher limits are paid by everyone, but
the benefits are gained by few.
Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZXDAJKRVSF6UUE5UEPE5PMXYXOLJ5A4V/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
