Kyle Stanley wrote: > or making *object* a positional only argument. Typo: I meant "positional only parameter", not "argument".
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:39 AM Kyle Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Inada Naoki wrote: > > If we find it broke some software, we can step back to regular > > deprecation workflow. > > Python 3.9 is still far from beta yet. That's why I'm +1 on these > proposals. > > IMO, since this would be changing a builtin function, we should at least > use a version+2 deprecation cycle (in this case, removal in 3.11) > regardless of reported breakages. > > Especially if there's no _substantial_ security, efficiency, or > performance reason for immediate prevention of str() without passing an > object (while specifying *encoding* and/or *error) or making *object* a > positional only argument. > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:31 AM Inada Naoki <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:25 PM Inada Naoki <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 for 1 and 2. >> > >> >> If we find it broke some software, we can step back to regular >> deprecation workflow. >> Python 3.9 is still far from beta yet. That's why I'm +1 on these >> proposals. >> >> -- >> Inada Naoki <[email protected]> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ >> Message archived at >> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HWNLBBHSVB5NRQC6ESQQNCQQ2EYUMW27/ >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KAQZGR37QU6BS6UVSW4H7F4MDOYFY5ZG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
