On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 9:40 AM Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it needs more words, though, to flesh out what about this is > allowed by the language (as opposed to what CPython happens to do), > and to get closer to what Guido is trying to get at with his > "*implicit* calls". For example, it's at work here, but there's not a > built-in container in sight: > > >>> import math > >>> def f(): > ... while True: > ... yield math.nan > >>> math.nan in f() > True >
The iterator/generator is behaving the way a lazy container would, so it's fairly unsurprising. Perhaps "container-like objects"? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LP6VL2GQZKOQEA4ZLLXKPB25IOSI6PHY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
