The "hey I'm a dict, but look over hear and now you can treat my like like any 
other object" duality doesn't sit well with me. I do understand the idea of 
wanting to convert something to convert JSON data into a more object-like 
access pattern, though.

So if something were to be brought in, for me the question would be whether 
it's an object that wraps a dict internally w/o re-exposing __getitem__() to 
the dict like a new veneer, or the creation of a new object that deep-copies 
the dict so it's more of an object transformation.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UU7WWQ7IYUIALUOTQNRZMRIG6CJPCBGY/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to