On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > Eric Snow wrote: > > 1. merge PEP 554 into 3.9 even if per-interpreter GIL doesn't get into 3.9 > > (they get parallelism for free in 3.10) > > 2. like 1, but mark the module as provisional until per-interpreter GIL > > lands > > 3. do not merge PEP 554 until per-interpreter GIL is merged > > 4. like 3, but publish a 3.9-only module to PyPI in the meantime > > My vote is for #2. No need to rush it and it gives you feedback on the API > from the public before it gets locked in for backwards-compatibility.
Yeah, I'd be fine with that. Actually, making the module provisional is already part of the PEP. :) > And you do know you could have done this as a poll on Discourse, right? Yeah, I thought of that after the fact. Then again, discourse isn't the tool I already had open. :) -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/CDVYBRIZ77BJN7WGGSLWULZ22SLB2TB5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
