On Jun 12, 2020, at 08:25, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Why not take a look at the list of open issues for 3.7 with PRs then? There 
> are 702 as of now.
> 
> https://bugs.python.org/issue?%40sort0=creation&%40sort1=&%40group0=&%40group1=&%40columns=title%2Cid%2Cactivity%2Cstatus&%40filter=status%2Cversions%2Cstage&status=1&versions=21&stage=4&%40pagesize=50&%40startwith=0

Looking at open PRs is a good suggestion. Unfortunately, the version tags on 
the bug tracker are not consistently maintained and updated. Just because there 
is a PR attached  to an issue doesn’t mean that it would be applicable today to 
all the versions selected in the issue.
 
A more accurate approach is to look at open PRs that are either explicitly 
targeted for 3.7 or which have the “needs backport to 3.7” label.  By those 
metrics, we currently have no open 3.7-specific PRs (the last was merged 
yesterday) and there are 60 open PRs with the 3.7 backport label. But even that 
number is high because some of those will end up not getting merged to master 
at all, and thus not backported, and others will be merged to master for 3.10 
and perhaps to 3.9 but deemed inappropriate to backport to 3.8 and/or 3.7.

https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+base%3A3.7

https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22needs+backport+to+3.7%22

  --
    Ned Deily
    [email protected] -- []
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/V3JTYA7NRU7PGOOWFZY2VQQPL42WI3J5/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to