On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:56 PM Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But how would you invoke them, other than using operator.add and > operator.concat? > > The case I was thinking of was just a direct call to `operator.concat`. > The motivation here is simply to make `operator.concat` do > something non-surprising on numpy arrays (be that `np.concatenate(a, b)`, > or simply `raise TypeError`). > I doubt numpy would actually advocate using it, but we can at least remove > the foot-gun. > Oh, that makes sense, as a CPython specific behavior. What does it do currently? Is the problem that it does the same thing as add? I'd vote for raising -- you shouldn't encourage or enable code that uses this pattern. (In general I am a big fan of just never using the operator module.) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4OBAZMPYMK6GW2ORCUCKLA3AK7P56UZU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
