On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:05 AM Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> On 24/06/20 11:57 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Matched key-value pairs must already be present in the mapping, and not > > created > > on-the-fly by ``__missing__`` or ``__getitem__``. For example, > > ``collections.defaultdict`` instances will only match patterns with keys > > that > > were already present when the ``match`` block was entered. > > Does that mean the pattern matching logic is in cahoots with > collections.defaultdict? What if you want to match against > your own defaultdict-like type? > IIUC the pattern matching uses either .get(key, <sentinel>) or .__contains__(key) followed by .__getitem__(key). Neither of those will auto-add the item to a defaultdict (and the Mapping protocol supports both). @Brandt: what does your implementation currently do? Do you think we need to specify this in the PEP? -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/OIYPFZL2Q3XYCKAJQHLVPQ6MTZM5T32U/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
