On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jim J. Jewett <[email protected]> wrote:
> I certainly understand saying "this change isn't important enough to > justify a change." > > But it sounds as though you are saying the benefit is irrelevant; Jim, if you include what you’re replying to in your own message (like I’m doing here), it will be easier for people to tell who / what you’re replying to. I wasn’t able to tell what your last few messages were in reply to. —Chris it is just inherently too expensive to ask programs that are already > dealing with internals and trying to optimize performance to make a > mechanical change from: > code.magic_attrname > to: > magicdict[code] > > What have I missed? > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TDCJFNHIAFEH5NIBEPP2GFP4C2BYR2DP/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DGMTJPPUQ3CJDMHPBL45BIJE2OMLXATG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
