On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jim J. Jewett <jimjjew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I certainly understand saying "this change isn't important enough to
> justify a change."
>
> But it sounds as though you are saying the benefit is irrelevant;


Jim, if you include what you’re replying to in your own message (like I’m
doing here), it will be easier for people to tell who / what you’re
replying to. I wasn’t able to tell what your last few messages were in
reply to.

—Chris


it is just inherently too expensive to ask programs that are already
> dealing with internals and trying to optimize performance to make a
> mechanical change from:
>     code.magic_attrname
> to:
>     magicdict[code]
>
> What have I missed?
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/TDCJFNHIAFEH5NIBEPP2GFP4C2BYR2DP/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/DGMTJPPUQ3CJDMHPBL45BIJE2OMLXATG/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to