On 2/16/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whereas if there weren't any funky coding style in the > first place, more potential compiler hackers might be > encouraged to have a go.
I'm trying to make the code simple. The style of code is different than other parts of Python, but a compiler is different than a bytecode engine or implementations of basic types. Different problem domains lead to different program structure. > Also I'm still wondering why we're going to all this effort > to build a whole new AST and compiler structure if the > purpose isn't to *avoid* all this transformation between > different representations. The goal is to get the right representation for the problem. It was harder to understand and modify the compiler when it worked on the concrete parse trees. The compiler now has a couple of abstractions that are well suited to particular phases of compilation. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
