Adam Olsen wrote: > While we're at it, any chance of renaming str/unicode to text in 3.0? > It's a MUCH better name, as evidenced by the opentext/openbytes names. > str is just some odd C-ism. > > Obviously it's a form of gratuitous breakage, but I think the long > term benefits are enough that we need to be *sure* that the breakage > would be too much before we discount it.
it's a very common variable name... </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
