On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 14:26, Thomas Wouters <tho...@python.org> wrote: > I'm not sure how to put it differently than I have in the PEP or the email: I > proposed they use ? instead of _ and also apply that to regular unpacking > (because it is very easy to see pattern matching as an extension of unpacking > assignment), and (besides other disagreements) they were uncomfortable > including non-pattern-matching proposals in their PEP. This PEP covers the > non-pattern-matching uses of '?'.
OK, fair. In which case, I'll probably wait for the revised pattern matching PEP, but I expect to be -1 on using ? there as well. I was fine with _ and the special rule TBH. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/NXHCGZ3P7GPRPEVTVBZVL2JEOFZWRHTX/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
