On 10/20/20 2:53 PM, Mark Shannon wrote: > I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.
a VM needs a separate backend for each architecture (maybe even OS) - which architectures do you include into your proposal? what's your estimate for a new port? - do you plan for a fall-back to a slow non-VM mode, e.g. the existing one? Do you plan to support that in parallel such that Python still can be used on architectures with a working compiler (and a libffi port). E.g. OpenJDK has the zero port, which is slow (interpreted), but runs on practically all architectures. Thanks, Matthias _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/H4O5TFWGL5SDG4NSESNGNKIZMK6W7L7V/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
