On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:48:59 +1100 Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, cool, got it - thanks! My reading of this is that a good few of > the benchmarks are coming out firmly in PyPy's favour, but a number of > them are still in CPython's favour (including "telco" where PyPy is > staggeringly worse for some reason).
The "telco" benchmark benefits heavily from the C decimal module written and ex-maintained by Stefan Krah. > for instance, > SQLAlchemy seems to be slower, but if you're using SQLAlchemy, you're > probably more concerned about database performance than the CPU cost > inside Python. I certainly wouldn't say that. The ORM's overhead can be quite important, and SQLAlchemy has dedicated C extensions to mitigate it. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/I7WVMX4JO2AKS2LYTBVY7S7MLCNPXKL3/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
