Jim J. Jewett writes: > I *hope* this was a typo! If > > case Point(x=a, y=b): > > assigns to a and b (instead of x and y, as in a normal call), then > that is ... going to be very easy for me to forget, and to miss > even when I'm aware of it.
I don't argue with your main point as a general principle, but I think I myself would probably be OK with real code where Points are probably used quite frequently (instead of being introduced in this line ;-) and the identifiers being bound aren't named "a" and "b". Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/XGFUWTOPW2JJDGYGOD3AM4HMLA6RMCTZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
