Hi Guido,

On 16/11/2020 4:41 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Thanks Mark, this is a helpful and valuable contribution.

I will try to understand and review it in the coming weeks (there is no hurry since the decision is up to the next SC) but I encourage you to just put it in PEP form and check it into the PEP repo.

Because I only skimmed very briefly, I don't have an answer to one question: does your PEP also define a precise mapping from the PEP 634 syntax to your "desugared" syntax? I think that ought to be part of your PEP.

No it doesn't define a precise mapping, and I don't think it will.
I'm not familiar enough with ever corner of PEP 634 to do that.
I could add a general "how to" guide though. It fairly straightforward conceptually but, as you know, the devil is in the details.

Cheers,
Mark.


--Guido

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:41 AM Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org <mailto:m...@hotpy.org>> wrote:

    Hi everyone,

    There has been much discussion on the syntax of pattern matching for
    Python (in case you hadn't noticed ;)

    Unfortunately the semantics seem to have been somewhat overlooked.
    What pattern matching actually does seems at least as important as the
    syntax.


    I believe that a pattern matching implementation must have the
    following
    properties:

    * The semantics must be precisely defined.
    * It must be implemented efficiently.
    * Failed matches must not pollute the enclosing namespace.
    * Objects should be able determine which patterns they match.
    * It should be able to handle erroneous patterns, beyond just syntax
    errors.

    PEP 634 and PEP 642 don't have *any* of these properties.


    I've written up a document to specify a possible semantics of pattern
    matching for Python that has the above properties, and includes reasons
    why they are necessary.

    
https://github.com/markshannon/pattern-matching/blob/master/precise_semantics.rst

    It's in the format of a PEP, but it isn't a complete PEP as it lacks
    surface syntax.

    Please, let me know what you think.

    Cheers,
    Mark.
    _______________________________________________
    Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
    <mailto:python-dev@python.org>
    To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
    <mailto:python-dev-le...@python.org>
    https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
    Message archived at
    
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/BTPODVYLPKY5IHWFKYQJICONTNTRNDB2/
    Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>)
/Pronouns: he/him //(why is my pronoun here?)/ <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/EDHCIYYAGW4YRLWD6BKLTQY7FRNNTZH7/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to