On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:19, David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:
>
> As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more 
> useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we 
> recommend." How divided was the vote? Who took the sides? What were the major 
> points of disagreement? That sort of thing.

My understanding was that the outgoing SC would fully brief the new
SC. The mail here is simply a summary view for the information of the
wider python-dev community.

Personally, I'm not sure how I feel about it. It's very much a good
thing in terms of transparency, something the SC seems to still be
trying to find the right balance on, but I feel that having seen this,
I'd be left with a lot of unanswered questions if the incoming SC ends
up rejecting the proposal, and therefore I don't really know how to
view the information with that context.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/KA3MJOZIKMJ3P2UCAYOJEGJASNF72GD5/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to